a couple was childless so they decided to try in-vitro inferltiziation. they found a woman who donated the egg, and another woman who would carry the child for 9 months. (they were all paid) so far three women are involved in this issue, the childless woman who initiated the contract, the other woman who donated the egg, and the last woman who carried the child. when the child was born, the childless woman was so happy that she finally has a child, however, as things would turnout to be, the woman who carried the baby now claims it is her child, she carried it for 9 months and can't let go of it, that the child has become a part of her, as if that weren't enough the woman who donated the egg claims she is the real mother of the child because she donated the egg , without her egg there will be no child. and the childless woman said that she took care of the baby, she cared for her, loved, and did everything for her and that makes her the rightful owner. the egg donor, and the carrier claimed that their life have been ememotionally altered, since taking part in the baby making, the child they say has become a part of them and they were willing to repaid the money, this case landed in court if you were the judge who would you award the child?