Nokia and sonyericsson, which is better? I think it is sonyericsson because of the memory and all facilities
Nokia and sonyericsson, which is better? I think it is sonyericsson because of the memory and all facilities
yes i tink is sonyericsson because it work very fast nd durable.i use nokia 3110c b4 wen download opera4.2 i discover dat my fone swithed off wen i want 2 received call lata i was told dat it has contacted virus bt nw am rockin wit SONY ERICSSON wit opera4.2 nd 5beta. so nokia na 4 makin odnary calls
@ viperman SE isnt about entertainment phones alone cos if u study their series you will discover that sonyericsson release their phones in a sensible manner.The K-series is just about its camera(that doesnt mean that other functions arent embedded in it),the W-series of course we all know is for the music lovers,P-series is for email pushing etc,Z-series are the flip phones while the J-series are the simple phones.You said nokia considers the common man,well i want you to know that SE also does that by making the J-series simple they are not as dumb as nokia that will make make a 6230 and later release 6230i with very different functionalities thereby confusing people who want to buy the phone,as far am concerned am married to SE till death do us apart and i can always make nokia my second wife.
For heaven sake,why should somebody compare NOKIA to SE? Nokia has the best features so far,in terms of pictures,data transfer,sound and ruggedity. Sony Ericsson proves to have good sound but not as quality as that of nokia,i've used Cybershoot ,the features therein is far below that of ma new nokia N72.The phone is really good.
n o k i a ------ CONNECTING PEOPLE.
sorry i've been good awhile. tins seem 2've gone pretty far & there are enuf facts for any dispassionate judge.
but addressing swaping functions, dis is cos of d symbian OS wh SE hav in p-series & new w-series. did u no dis same OS was built by SE, motorola & nokia jointly? so no credit there 4 nokia.
SE dont need 5yrs 2catch up, they're ahead fone2fone. each new SE is a breath of fresh air not stale like,
SE fan till 2moro!!!
You don't seem to get me. With just a little work on the N93, there won't be difference in both phones. Then why should they design the phone in the first place. They ought to have gone straight to N93i.
Though, I have never bought the 93i before and neither have I bought its predecessor. Because nowadays with a little tweeking I get to a level where buy most of the phones released are still lacking.
Every other manufacturer does the same, accepted but it is just way too much from Nokia.
If I must say, such products are meant for people who know little or nothing ordoes not make better enquiry about products and there features.
In my past post I compared the E series and one of the numerous N series there seem to be no difference and yet they expect their fans to buy their very expensive non different phones.
May be if people wake up, manufacturers like Nokia, Samsung, Motorola will stop producing the same type of phones 2 to 3 times for them to use and yet convincing them that it is different from the earlier products.
I've always been on the sidewalk, but with this ongoing comparison b/w SE & Nokia phones, i think it's time i move out of my cocoon and swing with the flow.
[li]SE fones are usually for the up & trendy generation, with lots of frills & thrills, catchy, chic, snazzy & appeals to the young at heart .
Very strong edge in the entertainment, camera & music sections.
They've got all the functns u'll ever dream of in a phone and VERY IMMUNE TO VIRUS attack (most of 'em run on java based applications and to corroborate what hs bn earlier said, they r mostly low/mid end fones). [/li]
However, Nokia fones have it's strong points as well;
And that is for the 'Upwardly Mobile', 'Jet Age" business executives (N & E series + the communicators).
However, everyone's choice of each brand is a pure function of individual 'perception', 'needs' ''functionality'.
Based on my own perception and needs, I'm an SE freak 4 life, Just used k750i once and I'm hooked on SE for ever.
To get a better comparison on the different aspects of all brands of phone, u can log in to http://www.mobile-review.com. They will help in deciding the wh brand to go 4.
No phone is safe from Virus
Easy to learn: Agreed but their User Interface is not as good that of SE's
Durability: Agreed but SE's are greater when it comes to Durability except if you buy china products; which is also available for Nokias too.
Loud Speaker: Please don't touch that area. That's is one of the feature that SE used in beating the hands of Nokia down.
Not Easy to have Virus: That is just one big lie. Have you forgotten about Commwarrior? It terrorises Nokia users the most and SE users are only bothered by the contineous ridiculous delivery of txt messeages from Nokia phones. Remember now?
Beauty: Too bad, are you denying the fact that they produced the ugliest phone more than any other manufacturers. Hey don't get me started. E70, 9500,
Simplicity: Nokia phones are not simple neither is the usage simple. Everything about it is complex. You have to travel to thousand miles before you get to its power button. Thanks to God Nokia is improving in its recent products.
Wake up please.
One thing most people do not realise is that Sony Products are still low ends and yet it competes High End phones of other manufacturers.
If you have hard of the Sony Ericsson SO903iTV Bravia phone you will know that Sony products are awesome. If you see there project for years to come you will know that SE is not in existence for jokes.
The phone was released earlier this year.
Sony Ericsson's SO903iTV will be the first handset to get the proper Bravia treatment.
Stylish red shell
Landscape orientation, 3-inch widescreen display
Built-in TV tuner with "time-shift video recording
Two-megapixel CMOS camera and a microSD card for loading up your media
Supports Felica cashless electronic payment system
Though the phone is said to be for only Japan buit it can be unlocked. When it comes to features the iPhone itself surrendered.
Common lets quite joking. Sometime last year I did some spy research on SE, pictures of plans I saw really amazed me.
@ marod,there are so many nokia phones with very low memory capacity and besides why are you guys comparing only the N-series?SE has got K,W and P series to contend with any other nokia series anyday anytime,even the T series can be compared with series 60.@ rufai P900 landed somewhere that will take nokia years to reach and the P1 is not out yet you are already condemning it.Please you guys just do as sniperwolf has said.Nokia LEARNS from SE
@ maxjax you talked about Nokia's 5.0 mega pixel I bet you've not seen a Sony Ericsson k850.
About the poster talking about business phone if you've used any of the SE p-series you'll never lack any business tool.
SonyEricsson rocks Nokia are full of poo. Imagine the k810 cyber shot with 3.2 M pixel is more better that N90 with 5.0.
For all Nokia lovers go exchange your phones with any friend dat has SE, I promise U, you'd want 2 give it back
I never compare any brand with Nokia!
Nokia is the best around the globe! you may compare with other brands, but not Nokia. Sonyericcsson contains nothing rather than Sound! They tried producing a Symbian Phone, but where have they landed?
P910, P990 and now P1 - all poo, get around Nokia N91, N80 feel the grip, Get around N95 and wooh, I shoulnt get further, you're already convinced
Very interesting reading all your opinions. I admit that SE are extremely good in terms of entertainment/music phones and camera picture quality. but i still believe nokia is better.
Let's be frank people:
1. Which other phone can u use as communication tool or self-defense object. The nokia 3310 in stone throwing mode is guaranteed to put an assailant in hospital if your aim is through.
2. Have you ever bothered to visit a gsm repair shop- you find nokia phones have a small share if u gather the damaged phones there
3. Cost effective - If you leave in Lagos like i do, it's wiser to buy a nokia (1100 or the 3310 again) when you bus around or during strolls. If you get mugged you are sure they'll return your phone back to you once they see it.
I don't experience all the breakdown news people give about phones. Every phone I use are always used to its peak.
If ou want to get a phone do researches the way you do for Laptops and other devices.
Sometimes I spend upto a year in finding the product that best fits my nature. You don't just hear that some phone is new:::::::: then you go straight for it without enquiries.
Every first set of product that comes after a prototype always lack some ability.
If you looking for first class entertainment,go for SE. If not then bliv people and go with nokia but their smartphones do restsrt by themselves. Hope y'all know that and for SE, The walkman models may hang or freeze and generally the bluetooth models but they still got the best audio in mobiles
All I have to say is when you are looking for standardized entertainment go for nothing but SE.
Nokia is always the business like type phone. No mattter what you stuff in it, its picture still remains.
Although at the moment Nokia is the peoples choice because of their new achievement in the last 3 high end Nseries phones.
One thing people should note is that most of the products SE are manufacturing are low end phones yet it competes with the high ends of the Nokia's. Imagine what their High ends would look like when they start releasing before the year runs out. I have seen some couples of their spy pictures. They really look amazing.
Mere looking at the sony ericsson's P1, you will definitely know that they've got more to offer.
pls my brother try sony ericsson. their fones are just too much
i used to be a nokai lover until i used my first sony ericsson w800i and i've been hooked since then.
no matter hoe cheap the fone is all the features u'll need will accompany it, good sound quality and i must tell u it's very user friendly.
u cant just compare a nokia phone to a sony ericsson.
Dont be deceived, i use all the faetures on my sonyericsson phone and i'll never ever for any reason use a nokia.
@juci, wat else do u wanna hear? do u want me to write out a 5page script jst to tell u which is which.
I only gave my answer to d questn cos of my xperience wit d Nokia 3250 phone, dat lil boy iss a bad Bottom.
Av u eva wondered wat phone perform @ least five operatns @ a time?
u play music, play game, browse d full internet, browse wap, do downloads in d background while u snd ur loved ones txt messages.
And its got a good nd long battery life too,
SE has better quality, nokia just has a bigger name. SE has always been trailblazers- camera(first 1.3mp, 2mp, 3.2mp), flash, bluetooth(since T68i), music(walkman series).
colly tanx 4 replying maxjax.
@maxjax: compare SE 3mp to nokia 3mp, now compare SE 5mp to nokia. too much! still in doubt, read expert's reviews online.
i've been using w800 for 2yrs no nokia can NEATLY beat it yet except for symbian OS which SE have in p-series & new w-series.
@maxjax Dats a lie Nokia neva started it first,it was ericsson cos when dey releasd K750 & W800 (all d features i mentiond were first embeded in dis fones)in 2005 Nokia did not even av a fone wit complete features,it is either blutooth or infra-red or vid. cam is misin & rememba dey startd rollin out thier N-series long afta K750 & W800 was releasd,so who is copy cat?In case u dont no K800 won d best fone last(Even d james bond guys tripd 4 it)